SCIENCE said:

Divine Angel said:

Bubblecar said:

It is a bit silly. They’d be calling him the gunman if he was dead.

blah blah innocent until proven guilty blah blah.

I don’t get it either. There’s clear footage and a thousand witnesses.

wrong perspective, you should be considering this from the point of view of the reporter, whereby 7 letters are cheap but a defamation suit is expensive

That’s the point though, there’d be no defamation in this case. It’s very clear that he is the gunman…