ms spock said:

Divine Angel said:

Interesting that Melania’s statement about Epstein is a thing now…

I haven’t been following lawsuits and such, but one Redditor had this to say about the timing:

RatRaceRunner
1d ago It’s the Michael Wolff anti-SLAPP lawsuit that was filed Tuesday, Oct 21 in NY. Nearly six months ago. lines up perfectly.

Link

Not a lawyer but looks like her lawyer played every card to delay, including avoiding being served and then moving court venues. That gets us to January.

Her counsel would have filed a motion to dismiss. Wolff’s counsel would send an opposition brief that would preview the evidence they intend to present to the court (that she met Trump through Epstein, was a prostitute, etc.) So, that might be interesting if it is attached to/ included with the court’s decision. NY has anti-SLAPP statutes that mandate the court needs to rule within 60 to 90 days.

So, court ruling is due any day now. Until they rule, discovery is frozen.

As soon as that ruling comes down, everyone in Epstein’s circle is going to get subpoena’d including Melania herself.

It was very strange. Weird. Apparently, Trump and his staff didn’t know. Her speech was run by some lawyers.

tacit synchronisation