The Rev Dodgson said:

Alleged:

“Why do some scientists like Judith Curry and John Clauser agree that CO2 increases temperature but still question climate action plans?

Curry is a climate “obfuscator” who has been paid to minimize the facts, although she has also been careful not to lie outright.

Clauser is a Nobel Prize winner in an unrelated discipline who fell for Richard Lindzen’s false and disproven cloud iris theory, about thirty years ago.

These are not climate scientists. They are the same sort of scientists as the 31,000 geologists, nuclear physicists, and Mickey Mouse and Spiro Agnew who signed the disinformation petition about thirty years ago.

In 2017 utility scale wind and utility scale solar generation became cheaper than all fossil and all nuclear power everywhere in the world.

This “debate” is funded by the dying fossil and nuclear industries. There is no serious question among real qualified scientists about the importance of climate change and the threat it presents to our future.”

and my question is: is Judith Curry really “a climate “obfuscator” who has been paid to minimize the facts”?

I don’t recall seeing that allegation before.

A search could not find anything related to that question.